Questions & Answers
Answers to the most frequently asked questions.
About the Challenge
In March 2026, McElhattan Foundation launched the Zero Electrocution Challenge seeking to catalyze and amplify bold ideas that present pathways to eliminate life-threatening tasks that lead to fatal workplace electrocution by the year 2050, while increasing enterprise profitability and productivity. Up to two Winners will each be awarded up to $1 million.
Electricity powers every aspect of modern work, yet it remains one of the most persistent causes of occupational death. Despite decades of regulations, training, and personal protective equipment (PPE), workers continue to die from electrical contact. Even low-voltage circuits can deliver fatal current under certain conditions, highlighting the limitations of procedural safety alone.
The industries most affected by this issue include construction, professional and business services, and trade, transportation and utilities. View our resources to learn more about the leading causes of electrical fatalities, including overhead power line contact, contact with energized equipment or working on energized parts, ground-faults, and more.
Learn more about the challenge, view our resources, and review our scoring criteria to help submit a strong proposal.
Please contact us with any challenge-related questions, requests for help with accessibility and special accommodations, and technical support.
Once you have registered and throughout the challenge, we will send important notifications to the email address associated with your account, as well as the primary and secondary contacts listed on your registration form. There are three important steps you can take to make sure these messages are received promptly:
- Add our email address to your contacts.
- Whitelist our email address. Here are instructions to add to your whitelist in most major email providers.
- Update your registration form right away if one of your contacts changes. If you need to make a contact change after the application window has closed, please email us, and we will assist you.
Eligibility
The Zero Electrocution Challenge welcomes nonprofits and for-profits (including fiscally-sponsored organizations) from a wide range of sectors to submit their proposed solutions to help eliminate life-threatening tasks that lead to fatal workplace electrocution by the year 2050.
To participate, each applicant must identify a Lead Organization who will assume responsibility for the receipt and management of any award and register by 5:00 PM Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 1, 2026
The following organizations are eligible to apply:
- An entity based in the United States and/or US territories under section 501(c)(3) and 509(a)(1) or (2) of the Internal Revenue Code (“IRC”) that has received a tax determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”).
- A private foundation based in the United States and/or US territories under section 501(c)(3) of the IRC that has received a tax determination letter from the IRS.
- A fiscally-sponsored nonprofit organization.
- A tribal government or tribal-owned enterprise.
- An educational entity, public college, junior college, or university that is either (i) recognized by the IRS as tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, or (ii) a governmental entity or instrumentality eligible to receive tax-deductible charitable contributions under Section 170(c)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code.
- A PreK-12 public, private, or charter school.
- A for-profit corporation organized under the laws of a State (or territory) in the United States.
- A benefit corporation, flexible purpose entity, or similar "hybrid" entity organized under the laws of a State (or territory) in the United States.
- A limited liability company or partnership organized under the laws of a State (or territory) in the United States.
Organizations of any size are welcome to participate.
Take our readiness quiz to gauge your fit and eligibility for this challenge, and review the Rules for a complete set of eligibility requirements.
The following are not eligible to apply as a Lead Organization:
- Individuals
- Entities based out of the United States or US territories
- Government agencies, including United Nations agencies, inter-governmental bodies, and regional cooperation agencies.
While these listed organization types are not eligible to apply as a Lead Organization, they may serve as partners on an application.
The following are not eligible to participate or apply as a Lead Organization, participant, partner or other collaborator:
- Individuals that include employees of Competition Sponsor, Carrot, and any of their subsidiaries and affiliates, and immediate family members (spouse, parent, child, sibling and their respective spouses, regardless of where they live) or persons living in the same households of such employees;
- An individual outside the age of consent to enter into a legally binding agreement under applicable law;
- A person whose participation has been permanently suspended or terminated under Section 4 of the Terms;
- A person who resides in or is a citizen of countries that are prohibited by law, regulation (including United States or other applicable export laws and regulations), treaty or administrative act from entering into trade relations (including export of technology) with the United States or its citizens;
- Subject to sanctions; or,
- In breach of any anti-corruption and/or sanctions, laws, and requirements applicable to You or your activities.
Review the Rules to learn more about eligible Lead Organizations and explore partnership opportunities if you are not eligible to serve as a lead. There are several ways to collaborate on an application.
Eligible Lead Organizations are welcome to collaborate with nonprofit organizations, companies, foundations, schools, colleges and universities, government agencies, individuals, and other entities (either U.S.-based or non-U.S.-based) in order to implement the project.
Organizations proposing to work together may be asked to demonstrate through a fully-executed Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) or other similar agreement, executed by all parties, that all parties have agreed that a single eligible entity or organization (i.e. the Lead Organization) will serve as the Winner and will have direction, control, and supervision of the proposed project and management of all Award funds and be responsible for all reporting requirements.
While MOUs will not be collected in the application, MOUs may be requested from teams that are selected as Finalists.
The Zero Electrocution Challenge invites proposals for innovative solutions that present pathways to eliminate fatal electrocution on the job, advance enterprise productivity and profitability, and meet the four criteria outlined in the scoring rubric:
- Effective: Can the approach eliminate life-threatening tasks that lead to fatal electrocution on the job, while keeping profitability and productivity? Will the solution be cost-efficient, business-friendly, and ready to implement within the project period?
- Game-Changing: Will the solution accelerate the elimination of fatal electrocution on the job and result in other compelling benefits? Is it grounded in a truly original concept, or does it propose new ways to bolster or adapt existing practices?
- Feasible: Are there practical plans and budget to mitigate risk and succeed? Does the team have the expertise, buy-in, and resources required to reasonably develop an industry-facing, effective, and adoptable solution during the project period?
- Scalable: Can the approach be replicated and/or scaled to contexts identified in the proposal? Can the team reliably and effectively adapt the solution to decrease and eventually eliminate fatal electrocution in a wide range of workplaces and industries?
Solutions at any stage are eligible to apply, including those in the research and ideation stage, and there is no requirement or preference for a hardware versus a software solution.
The scoring rubric considers evidence of effectiveness and feasibility, regardless of stage. If you do not have evidence of impact of your own solution, be sure to point to research-backed practices on which your solution is based, or analogous solutions achieving meaningful impact that you think your solution may similarly achieve.
Please note: The nature of the problem requires solutions that can be implemented in workplaces and are not vulnerable to human error. For example, a proposed solution focused on stand-alone training materials only would be unlikely to score well on the scoring rubric under Game-Changing and Feasibility. However, process innovations and adaptations to approaches to the work could score well on these traits. Be sure to review the scoring rubric to understand how applications will be evaluated.
Winners will be announced in Spring 2027 and will have opportunity to share progress on the proposed goals and objectives of their solution over a maximum two-year project period.
While the scoring rubric considers evidence of feasibility, the timeline for each proposal is dependent on the nature of the solution. Note that we will support opportunities that present pathways to eliminate fatal workplace electrocution, which does not mean that solutions must have an exact date planned to go to market. We leave it up to applicants to determine the best timeline and milestones that work for their proposal, so long as they are within the project period.
Winners will be publicly announced in Spring 2027. McElhattan Foundation will work with each awardee to execute an award agreement. Following the execution of the award agreement, the project will be implemented over a maximum two-year project period.
Solutions at any stage are eligible to apply, including those in the research and ideation stage. Research-focused proposals that deliver practical solutions at technology readiness levels (TRL) 5-6 could be appropriate. We encourage you to review the scoring rubric to understand how we have defined a strong proposal.
For-profit entities are eligible to apply but their solution must meet the criteria outlined in the Rules. Commercialization of a solution does not preclude eligibility, and commercialization could be one pathway to address the scalability criteria outlined in the scoring rubric.
More information about charitable purpose and private benefit can be found on the IRS website (examples can be found here and here).
Application
We encourage you to first assess your fit and eligibility for the Zero Electrocution Challenge, then register no later than 5:00 PM Eastern Time on Tuesday, September 1, 2026, to participate. Registration is required and is a simple two-step process. First, create a username and password then check your inbox to confirm your registration. Next, complete the online registration form. Once you are registered, submit your application online no later than 5:00 PM Eastern Time on Thursday, September 24, 2026.
Please note that registration does not require you to submit an application, but it is required to participate should you decide to apply. As such, we encourage you to register before the deadline, even if you are still deciding whether to apply.
You may only complete one submission as the Lead Organization except as described below. An organization can serve as a partner on a team for multiple applications provided that each application proposes a separate, distinct solution. This means each project can only be submitted once, and we leave it up to each team to designate their eligible Lead Organization.
Regional or location-specific branches of larger organizations, as well as departments, schools, and nonprofits within or based in a college/university, can each register and submit separately as the Lead Organization on one application. Participants may list both the parent organization and the specific applicant/project in the Lead Organization field on the registration form, such as College/Department (Parent organization) or Parent Organization – Project Name.
In all circumstances described above, the proposed projects must be separate and distinct. There should be no overlap in team members. The intent of the policy is to ensure that any team is concentrating their best effort into a single application. We encourage teams to select a single project that best represents your organization's ability to deliver a solution that meets the scoring criteria.
Review the Rules for more information.
Each application must include a brief video of no more than 90 seconds that showcases your project. This DOES NOT need to be a professionally produced video – a video shot on a smartphone is acceptable. The quality of your video will not impact the outcome of your proposal.
The following are instructions for recording and uploading your video on YouTube:
- Record a video using your smartphone’s camera app
- Download and open the YouTube app
- Sign-in or create an account on YouTube
- In YouTube, select “Create” > “Upload a Video”
- Select your video and press “Next”
- Set your video’s visibility to “Unlisted,” which will allow only those with the URL link to view your video (do not set to private or public)
- Select “Upload Video”
- Check to make sure embedding is turned on.
For more information about video guidelines, review the submission requirements. If you need technical support, you can email us.
No, the application does not include a question about letters of support. Please review the submission requirements to learn more about what is required at this stage. If your team is invited to participate in any future phases of this competition, you may be asked to provide additional information, which could include letters of support. Examples of what information may be requested from applicants can be found under Section J of the application.
We encourage you to review the submission requirements for more information about what is required of applicants.
Section E of the application provides definitions for the various eligible solution stages. Please keep in mind that the scoring rubric considers evidence of effectiveness and feasibility, regardless of stage.
Section G of the application also includes the required question Evidence of Effectiveness. Here, applicants will provide evidence to show that the solution will work. You can present any internal evidence, such as informal studies, observations, or other indicators of change, or formal evidence, including any evaluation results. If you do not have evidence of impact of your own solution, you can point to research-backed practices on which your solution is based, or analogous solutions achieving meaningful impact that you think your solution may similarly achieve. In the same section, the question Evidence Type provides definitions for the various levels of evidence that are eligible.
If your team is invited to participate in any future phases of this competition, you may be asked to provide additional information. Examples of what information may be requested from applicants can be found under Section J of the application.
We leave it up to each applicant to best describe their solution within the maximum word counts provided in the application. Technical details that help to support claims made in the application around the solution’s impact are encouraged. While we ask that you avoid sharing sensitive or confidential information in your application responses, please be sure to provide as much relevant information as necessary for reviewers to evaluate.
Yes, you may update the registration form until the application deadline at 5:00 PM Eastern Time on Thursday, September 24, 2026. From the Submissions tab of the platform, you can select Registration Form to update this information.
Your submission may be shared with five of your fellow applicants as part of Peer-to-Peer Review, five Evaluation Panel members, the Selection Committee, and the ZERO 2050 team during the evaluation process. All peer reviewers and Evaluation Panel judges will be required to commit to keeping all application materials they review confidential. While we ask that you avoid sharing sensitive or confidential information in your application responses, please be sure to provide as much relevant information as necessary for reviewers to evaluate.
Portions of your application may be published online and may be shared with the general public to promote your proposal or to highlight results. For example: After Winners are announced, an online searchable database of applications will be shared on the challenge website and may include (but is not limited to) the following application responses for each participant: Lead Organization, Lead Organization Website, Solution Title, Solution Statement, Executive Summary, Video Pitch, and Solution Description.
Note: Applicants will have the opportunity to opt-out of the searchable database if they prefer.
Applicants will retain the intellectual property (IP) for their solutions. Review section 9 of the Rules for more information about the treatment and use of intellectual property.
You may share login credentials with your team members as needed, but only one person can be logged in at a time to complete the submission. Applicants may collaborate as a team to complete the application offline and/or on the platform. It does help to designate one person responsible for entering your responses into the online application.
McElhattan Foundation has compiled data about fatal workplace electrocution. We encourage participants to review these resources as you prepare your application.
Your work saves automatically and the status of your application is available to view on your dashboard.
You have the option to request an automated confirmation email after clicking Submit – be sure the checkbox is clicked to opt into this email when the confirmation message appears.
The platform works best when using Google Chrome as your browser on a laptop or desktop computer, with view zoom at 100%. If you experience technical issues while using other browsers, please try Chrome and email us if you need additional technical support.
Evaluation & Selection
Once the submission deadline passes, the ZERO 2050 team will perform an administrative review to confirm each submission meets the Rules and submission requirements before advancing to Peer-to-Peer Review.
Peer-to-Peer Review is required for applicants to complete from late October to mid-November 2026 to remain eligible for the prize and will result in a rank order of all valid submissions. Applications that advance to Peer-to-Peer Review will be scored by five fellow applicants. Based on the rank order of scores, a selection of top-scoring applications will move forward to the Evaluation Panel.
Peer reviewers and the Evaluation Panel will use the scoring rubric to provide scores and valuable feedback on their assigned submissions, and all scores will be statistically normalized to ensure fairness. Applicants that advance to the Evaluation Panel will be reviewed by five judges.
All valid applications that proceed to Peer-to-Peer Review – as well as the selection of applications that proceed to Evaluation Panel review – will receive anonymized and normalized scores and feedback from the reviewers assigned to their submission.
Informed by the resulting rank order of applications after Evaluation Panel review, up to five Finalists will be selected for site visits from January – March 2027. Following the site visits, the ZERO 2050 team will select Finalist applications for consideration by the Selection Committee.
Based on considerations that may include, but are not limited to, Evaluation Panel resulting rank order and a diversity of solutions, geography, and feasibility, the Selection Committee will recommend up to two Winners to each receive $1 million. Final decisions and selection of the Winners will be made by McElhattan Foundation.
Winners will be announced in early 2027.
Information about Peer-to-Peer Review is available on the Timeline and Evaluation pages. Applicants with valid submissions who move on to Peer Review will be notified by Tuesday, October 27, 2026, and will be invited to participate in another Q&A webinar on that day at 12:00 PM Eastern Time. The save the date and sign-up details will be emailed to those with valid submissions.
To score and comment on the submissions during Peer-to-Peer Review, you will access the same online platform with the same email address and password used to submit your application. If needed, these login credentials may be shared with the team member you have selected to be responsible for Peer-to-Peer Review. We ask that this team member be the programmatic expert on your team who is very familiar with your submission and proposed solution, and that this same team member completes review for all the assigned submissions.
You could work collaboratively on this review as well, and we recommend you designate one team member to finalize the scores/comments to check for consistency and enter them into the platform. You cannot log in at the same time, so please coordinate accordingly to avoid any errors.
Solutions at any stage are eligible to apply, including those in the research and ideation phase. Please review the application for more information about eligible solution stages.
Peer reviewers and Evaluation Panel judges will use the scoring rubric to provide scores and feedback on their assigned submissions. The four criteria are: effective, game-changing, feasible, and scalable. These criteria are intended to support peer reviewers and Evaluation Panel members in assessing both technological maturity and long-term impact. The Zero Electrocution Challenge is seeking solutions that present promising pathways to eliminate fatal electrocution in the workplace by 2050, which are not susceptible to human error and can be applied across industry. Solutions that are susceptible to human error are unlikely to score well on the Effective criteria and solutions that cannot be applied to other contexts are unlikely to score well on the Scalable criteria.
The scoring rubric provides more information about how we have defined each of these criteria. We encourage you to review this webpage and toggle between scores to view how we have defined a strong proposal.
Depending on the stage of the solution, the timelines for impact may differ. We leave it up to each applicant to best describe their solution and how it will present pathways to end fatal workplace electrocution by 2050, including measurable or clear benchmarks that would be achieved during the two-year project period and after.
Several questions in the application provide opportunities for applicants to demonstrate expected results and potential for successfully eliminating fatal workplace electrocution by the year 2050. For example, please review Section E (The Solution), Section G (The Impact), and Section H (Project Plan & Budget). This challenge has intentionally broad parameters as we welcome a wide range of innovative solutions.
Peer reviewers and the Evaluation Panel judges will use the scoring rubric to provide their scores and comments. We encourage you to review this webpage and toggle between scores to view how we have defined a strong proposal. Applicants will be evaluated on how they understand the solution to be scalable and feasible across industries and the strength of their proposed solution to achieve breakthrough solutions. McElhattan Foundation recognizes that innovations that transform industries can take time to scale and this is reflected in the scoring criteria.
Yes! Each team who participates in Peer-to-Peer Review will receive anonymized and normalized scores from the reviewers, as well as written feedback.
Each Peer-to-Peer reviewer and Evaluation Panel judge scores on the submissions assigned to them using the scoring rubric. In addition to numeric scores, reviewers are required to provide comments to justify each score and note their overall impression of each application. A selection of top-scoring applications will move forward to the Evaluation Panel and those applicants will receive an additional set of anonymized and normalized scores and comments from those judges.
We find that this feedback is one of the most important aspects of participating in challenges—and that even if you are not selected as a Winner, you walk away with valuable feedback that you can then use to refine your proposal and seek other funding or expanded support.
The award can be used for a wide range of costs, including staffing fees, technical expenses, field testing, commercialization expenses, licensing fees, professional services and other costs. Award funds must be used for the project for which they are intended and may be dispersed to partners for project-related purposes. There are no specific restrictions around Lead Organizations subgranting to foreign contractors as long as all Rules and requirements are met.
Award funds may not be used:
- For non-charitable purposes;
- To influence the outcome of any specific public election or to carry on, directly or indirectly, any voter registration drive (within the meaning of United States Internal Revenue Code (“Code”) section 4945(d)(2));
- To carry on propaganda or otherwise to attempt to influence legislation within the meaning of Code Section 4945(d)(1);
- To distribute funds to any organization not related to the proposal;
- To distribute, transfer, or otherwise pay funds, directly or indirectly, to any organization, entity, or person that is organized under the laws of, headquartered or with a primary place of business in, or who resides in or is a citizen of, countries that are prohibited by law, regulation (including United States or other applicable export laws and regulations), treaty or administrative act from entering into trade relations (including export of technology) with the United States or its citizens;
- To distribute, transfer, or otherwise pay funds, directly or indirectly, to any organization, entity, or person that is subject to sanctions, or in breach of any applicable anti-corruption or other laws or requirements;
- To make an award to any organization not identified in the proposal, to make an award to any individual for travel, study, or other similar purposes, or to make an award to any organization, except in compliance with the provisions of Sections 4945(g) or (h), as the case may be;
- For the creation of any endowment or for the aggregation of philanthropic capital by organizations that regrant to nonprofit organizations;
- For the creation of a venture capital fund, or pooled funds to invest in or distribute to for-profit organizations;
- For loans or microloans to individuals, nonprofit, or for-profit entities;
- To fund general operating support for the Lead Organization and/or any partners;
- To fund political organizations (501(c)(4) organizations and 527s);
- For government services.
Review the Rules for more information.
Once the submission deadline passes, applicants will not be able to revise their submitted application. Informed by the resulting rank order of applications after Evaluation Panel review, up to five Finalists will be selected for site visits from January – March 2027.
If your team is invited to participate in any future phases of this competition, such as the site visit phase, you may be asked to provide additional information. Examples of what information may be requested from applicants can be found under Section J of the application. The ZERO 2050 team may submit questions to the Finalist in advance of the site visit, which will provide Finalists with an opportunity to provide further details or clarify questions that emerged from the application.
If you are selected to participate in future phases, we may also require information necessary to understand the financial health of the Lead Organization. The ZERO 2050 team may request audited financial reports, 990’s, and/or certified financials for the past two (2) years. If audited financial reports, 990’s, and/or certified financials for the past two (2) years are not available, the ZERO 2050 team will work with you to request alternative information to understand the financial health of the Lead Organization. This information may include, but is not limited to, opening balance sheets, financial statements since formation and/or projected operating budgets.
This challenge will not include Finalist mentoring opportunities.
Solutions that are commercially feasible and scalable are encouraged. The Foundation will not retain IP rights over solutions in which it makes an early investment.
The Winners will be publicly announced in Spring 2027. McElhattan Foundation will work with the awardees to execute the award agreement. Following the execution of the award agreement, the project will be implemented over a maximum two-year project period. Winners will be required to report progress towards milestones and other goals. Those reporting requirements may vary, based on the organization and the project, and will be determined by McElhattan Foundation. Review the Rules for more information.
